<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Netvouz - link info</title>
<link>http://netvouz.com/url/bc90874413d5316791d3b04387f0bedc?feed=rss</link>
<description>Info about a link</description>
<item><title>Is Design Dead?</title>
<link>http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/designDead.html</link>
<description>For many that come briefly into contact with Extreme Programming, it seems that XP calls for the death of software design. Not just is much design activity ridiculed as &quot;Big Up Front Design&quot;, but such design techniques as the UML, flexible frameworks, and even patterns are de-emphasized or downright ignored. In fact XP involves a lot of design, but does it in a different way than established software processes. XP has rejuvenated the notion of evolutionary design with practices that allow evolution to become a viable design strategy. It also provides new challenges and skills as designers need to learn how to do a simple design, how to use refactoring to keep a design clean, and how to use patterns in an evolutionary style.</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/emmineb?category=8510405148731529291"></category>
<author>emmineb</author>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>Is Design Dead? XP Design Phylosophy</title>
<link>http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/designDead.html</link>
<description>Metaphor</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/WillySnowMan?category=3408755425709067635">Programming &gt; UML</category>
<author>WillySnowMan</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:41:25 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>Is Design Dead?</title>
<link>http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/designDead.html</link>
<description></description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/traderinthezone?category=2739113986060086983"></category>
<author>traderinthezone</author>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 09:45:30 GMT</pubDate>
</item></channel></rss>