<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Netvouz / garoldstone / tag / nsa</title>
<link>http://netvouz.com/garoldstone/tag/nsa?feed=rss&amp;pg=6</link>
<description>garoldstone&#39;s bookmarks tagged &quot;nsa&quot; on Netvouz</description>
<item><title>Hayden Unafraid to Confront Controversy (p)(f)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/07/AR2006050700384.html</link>
<description></description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/garoldstone?category=3204918503088165958"></category>
<author>garoldstone</author>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 23:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>House approves changes in terror spy program (f)</title>
<link>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2007/08/05/NT5ARD8Q62.DTL&amp;type=politics</link>
<description>(08-05) 04:00 PDT Washington -- Under pressure from President Bush, the House on Saturday gave final approval to changes in a terrorist surveillance program despite serious objections from many Democrats about the scope of the executive branch&#39;s new eavesdropping power.</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/garoldstone?category=3204918503088165958"></category>
<author>garoldstone</author>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 13:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>House Approves Wiretap Measure (f)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/04/AR2007080401744.html</link>
<description>a secret court ruling earlier this year that complicated the wiretapping of purely foreign communications that happen to pass through a communications node on U.S. soil. The bill would give the National Security Agency the right to collect such communications in the future without a warrant. But it goes further than that: It also would allow the interception and recording of electronic communications involving, at least in part, people &quot;reasonably believed to be outside the United States&quot; without a court&#39;s order or oversight. Aug 5, 2007</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/garoldstone?category=3204918503088165958"></category>
<author>garoldstone</author>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 04:55:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>How do the feds tap phone lines? (p)(f)</title>
<link>http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/021306-wiretap.html</link>
<description></description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/garoldstone?category=3204918503088165958"></category>
<author>garoldstone</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:09:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>How the Fight for Vast New Spying Powers Was Won (f)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/11/AR2007081101349.html?nav=rss_world</link>
<description>Bush administration leveraged Democratic acquiescence into a broader victory: congressional approval of a Republican bill that would expand surveillance powers far beyond what Democratic leaders had initially been willing to accept.</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/garoldstone?category=3204918503088165958"></category>
<author>garoldstone</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:31:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>In Speech, Bush Says He Ordered Domestic Spying - New York Times (p)(f)</title>
<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/18/politics/18bush.html?ex=1292562000&amp;en=6b2fdf6ea590910a&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss</link>
<description>- President Bush acknowledged on Saturday that he had ordered the National Security Agency to conduct an electronic eavesdropping program in the United States without first obtaining warrants, and said he would continue the highly classified program because it was &quot;a vital tool in our war against the terrorists.&quot;</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/garoldstone?category=3204918503088165958"></category>
<author>garoldstone</author>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>Inquiry Into Wiretapping Article Widens - New York Times (p)(f)</title>
<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/12/politics/12inquire.html?hp&amp;ex=1139720400&amp;en=bec57e8374e374e4&amp;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage</link>
<description>Federal agents have interviewed officials at several of the country`s law enforcement and national security agencies in a rapidly expanding criminal investigation into the circumstances surrounding a New York Times report ... New York Times Feb 11, 2006</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/garoldstone?category=3204918503088165958"></category>
<author>garoldstone</author>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:37:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>Judge Hears Arguments in Spy Program Case (p)(f)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/10/AR2006071000961.html</link>
<description>Government attorneys continued Monday to argue that state secrets would be breached if a lawsuit challenging President Bush&#39;s domestic spying program is heard in federal court. July 10, 2006</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/garoldstone?category=3204918503088165958"></category>
<author>garoldstone</author>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:25:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>Judge refuses to halt suit against U.S. spy agency (p)(f)</title>
<link>http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/business/index.ssf?/base/news-34/1149243253291870.xml&amp;storylist=mibusiness</link>
<description>U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor says she will go ahead with hearings in a legal challenge to a warrantless domestic surveillance program run by the National Security Agency. The Bush administration says hearings in the lawsuit would reveal state secrets that affect national security. Diggs Taylor also criticized the Justice Department for failing to respond to the Jan. 18 legal challenge, The Detroit News said. June 2, 2006</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/garoldstone?category=3204918503088165958"></category>
<author>garoldstone</author>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:18:21 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>Justice Dept. to Examine Its Use of NSA Wiretaps (p)(f)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/27/AR2006112701063.html</link>
<description>The Justice Department&#39;s inspector general yesterday announced an investigation into the department&#39;s connections to the government&#39;s controversial warrantless surveillance program, but officials said the probe will not examine whether the National Security Agency is violating the Constitution or federal statutes. Nov 26, 2006</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/garoldstone?category=3204918503088165958"></category>
<author>garoldstone</author>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 01:06:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item></channel></rss>