<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Netvouz / PROJECTCONSULT / tag / trends</title>
<link>http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT/tag/trends?feed=rss&amp;pg=18</link>
<description>PROJECTCONSULT&#39;s bookmarks tagged &quot;trends&quot; on Netvouz</description>
<item><title>[EN] Email mail sucks. Let&#39;s move on.</title>
<link>http://aiim.typepad.com/aiim_blog/2011/02/email-mail-sucks-lets-move-on-for-most-things.html</link>
<description>Email mail sucks. Let&#39;s move on. | John Mancini | 15.02.2011</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:23:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] EMC with Documentum in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for ECM</title>
<link>http://www.emc.com/about/news/press/2011/20110202-01.htm</link>
<description>EMC commenting very late on the Gartner ECM Quadrant from November 2010. While Microsoft with Sharepoint, IBM with Social Business and OpenText with the acquisition of Metastorm show a lot of ECM activity, around Oracle and EMC it is somehow very quiet</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Enterprise Content Management | Ulrich Kampffmeyer | 2004</title>
<link>http://www.doxtop.com/browse/a21daf8b/trends-in-records-document-and-enterprise-content-management.aspx</link>
<description>Some ECM history ... early whitepaper by PROJECT CONSULT about ECM Enterprise Content Management | 2004 | This whitepaper was the original source for the Wikipedia article on ECM</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:11:06 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Enterprise Content Management 2010 and Beyond: The Future of Information Intelligence and Governance | AIIM | December ...</title>
<link>http://www.aiim.org/erm/infonomics/ecm-2010-and-beyond.aspx</link>
<description>Enterprise Content Management 2010 and Beyond: The Future of Information Intelligence and Governance | AIIM | December 2009 | Mark Lewis | ERM Electronic Records Management</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Enterprise Content Management: Best Practices and Benchmarks | Gartner</title>
<link>http://www.gartner.com/technology/it-initiatives/enterprise-content-management.jsp</link>
<description>Enterprise Content Management: Best Practices and Benchmarks | Gartner | 25.05.2011 | Video | Debra Logan | Enterprise Content Management: Best Practices and Benchmarks | Business buyers want clear business cases for further investment in enterprise content management; we&#39;ve gathered some of the best proof points.</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 10:47:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Enterprise information management | Wikipedia</title>
<link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_information_management</link>
<description>Enterprise information management | Wikipedia | Enterprise information management is the name for the field that combines business intelligence (BI) and enterprise content management (ECM). Enterprise information management (EIM) takes these two approaches to managing information one step further, in that it approaches the information management discussion from an enterprise perspective. Where BI and ECM respectively manage structured and unstructured information, EIM does not make this rather &quot;technical&quot; distinction. It approaches the management of information from the perspective of enterprise information strategy, based on the needs of information workers. ECM and BI in a sense choose a denominationalised approach, since they only cover part of the in...</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:16:33 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Enterprise Information Management: Information Virtualization for a Unified Business View | EMC | August 2008</title>
<link>http://www.emc.com/collateral/leadership/h5586-enterprise-information-management-wp.pdf</link>
<description>Enterprise Information Management: Information Virtualization for a Unified Business View | EMC | August 2008</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Fabasoft &quot;Folio&quot; Records Management is MoReq2 certified</title>
<link>https://www.xing.com/app/forum?op=showarticles;wsa=49517406.39be13;articleid=23497981;id=23497981#23497981</link>
<description>31.07.2009</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:24:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Facebook Graph Search Is Boring: We Need A Unified Search AI | ReadWrite</title>
<link>http://readwrite.com/2013/01/15/facebook-graph-search-is-boring-we-need-a-unified-search-ai</link>
<description>Facebook Graph Search Is Boring: We Need A Unified Search AI | ReadWrite | Jon Mitchell | 15.01.2013 | The big Facebook news tech blogs were all freaking out about turned out to be just another shot in the platform wars. There&#39;s nothing exciting about Facebook&#39;s Graph Search. It&#39;s just another way to lock in free users to a mediocre, incomplete service, just like Google wants to do with Google+. Until there&#39;s a personalized, natural-language search box that can search whatever and wherever we want, I don&#39;t think anything else matters. The way I see it, there are three companies offering rudimentary artificial intelligence to consumers at a grand scale: Google, Apple, and now Facebook. (Sorry, Microsoft, you&#39;re a distant fourth.) All of these companies wa...</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 09:13:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Facebook vs. Google+ | Infographic | Technobombs blog</title>
<link>http://www.technobombs.com/infographic-facebook-vs-google/</link>
<description>Facebook vs. Google+ | Infographic | Technobombs blog | 11.07.2011 || The real problem is - too many social platforms are fighting for your attention: Google+, Linkedin, Twitter, XING, Facebook, Slideshare, Delicious, Scribd, a.s.o. Your time is spoiled and your concentration is devided. You cannot be everywhere and &quot;automation&quot; only creates the &quot;noise of redundancy&quot;. The fight will end soon - there will be a concentration of the majority users to one platform. There as well advertisements, SEO and direct communication will concentrate. And the rest of social platforms will slowly disappear into the shadows of the early history of the electronic information age.</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:52:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item></channel></rss>