<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Netvouz / PROJECTCONSULT / tag / migration</title>
<link>http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT/tag/migration?feed=rss</link>
<description>PROJECTCONSULT&#39;s bookmarks tagged &quot;migration&quot; on Netvouz</description>
<item><title>[DE] Florian Laumer: [EN] SharePoint 2013 Standard vs. Enterprise vs. Foundation Feature Comparison Matrix</title>
<link>http://florianlaumer.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/sharepoint-2013-standard-vs-enterprise-vs-foundation-feature-comparison-matrix/</link>
<description>[DE] Florian Laumer: [EN] SharePoint 2013 Standard vs. Enterprise vs. Foundation Feature Comparison Matrix | Und bevor Office 2013 Ende Januar released wird, gibt es schon einen sehr guten Eintrag im TechNet wo die Unterschiede der verschiedenen Versionen dargestellt werden. Wichtig: das alles betrifft die onPremise Installationen.</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:44:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[DE] Migration von ECM-Lösungen: Move or Stay? | XING Themen</title>
<link>https://www.xing.com/topics/de/migration-von-ecm-losungen-move-or-stay-12535</link>
<description>Migration von ECM-Lösungen: Move or Stay? | Ulrich Kampffmeyer | XING Themen | Grüne Wiese gibt es in Punkto ECM selten. Bei den meisten Organisationen und Unternehmen gibt es bereits &quot;irgendetwas&quot; im Keller - DMS, Archiv, ECM - wie auch immer genannt. Anstelle der Neubeschaffung tritt so häufig das Thema Ablösung oder Update. Aktuelle Studien gehen davon aus, dass das Migration 2013 ein &quot;hot topic&quot; sein wird.</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:36:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Digital Forensics and Digital-Born Content in Cultural Heritage Collections</title>
<link>http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub149/pub149.pdf</link>
<description></description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Digital Landfill - John Mancini: 100 technology predictions (plus 10 of my own) for 2013</title>
<link>http://www.digitallandfill.org/2012/12/100-technology-predictions-plus-10-of-my-own-for-2013.html</link>
<description>In an earlier post (2013 Predictions -- Systems of Record and Systems of Engagement -- What Comes Next?) I talked about the next steps in the &quot;collision&quot; between Systems of Record and Systems of Engagement. That got me thinking about all of the other &quot;prediction&quot; posts relative to technology.  I have to admit, I love these posts. So following a quick recap of my own predictions re SoR and SoE, you will find 100 (yes 100) predictions from posts I found interesting. This, of course, is not to imply that I&#39;ve found them all.  Most likely not. So if you know of some I&#39;ve missed, add the link in the comments and I&#39;ll add them to the list.</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:11:53 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Why is content migration so difficult? | James Lappin | 13.02.2012</title>
<link>http://thinkingrecords.co.uk/2012/02/13/why-is-content-migration-so-difficult/</link>
<description>Why is content migration so difficult? | James Lappin | 13.02.2012 | Thinking Records | Content migration is a problem that affects all organisations, and which affects archivists as much as records managers | The description is correct, but is MoReq2010 really a solution to solve the migration problem? I think - No!</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:52:42 GMT</pubDate>
</item></channel></rss>