<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Netvouz / PROJECTCONSULT / tag / [en]</title>
<link>http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT/tag/%5Ben%5D?feed=rss&amp;pg=22</link>
<description>PROJECTCONSULT&#39;s bookmarks tagged &quot;[en]&quot; on Netvouz</description>
<item><title>[EN] European Commission</title>
<link>http://www.bit.ly/9GqVan</link>
<description>Changes for Electronic Invoices</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:29:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] European Commission - Archival policy - Moreq</title>
<link>http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/archival_policy/moreq/index_en.htm</link>
<description>Seite der Europäischen Kommission zu MoReq2 in Englisch</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:18:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] European Commission - Archival policy - Moreq</title>
<link>http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/archival_policy/moreq/</link>
<description>Seite der Europäischen Kommission zu MoReq2 mit Download des Standards und der Testszenarien (der ursprüngliche Standard ist ganz weg; siehe hierzu http://www.MoReq2.de - Quellen).</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:51:54 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] European Commission - Archival policy - Moreq2</title>
<link>http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/archival_policy/moreq/spec_moreq2_en.htm</link>
<description>Downloadseite für den MoReq2 Standard bei der Europäische Kommission (ursprünglich stand hier der Tender).</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:53:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Europeana wins Erasmus prize | http</title>
<link>http://group.europeana.eu/</link>
<description>//www.Europeana.eu | EuroMedia Awards | ESEC | 16.10.2009</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:13:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Europeana&#39;s huge cultural dataset opens for re-use | EUROPEANA metadata as Public Domain</title>
<link>http://bit.ly/Europeana-Metadata</link>
<description>EUROPEANA&#39;S HUGE CULTURAL DATASET OPENS FOR RE-USE The Hague, 12 September 2012 - Opportunities for apps developers, designers and other digital innovators will be boosted today as the digital portal Europeana opens up its dataset of over 20 million cultural objects for free re-use. The massive dataset is the descriptive information about Europe&#39;s digitised treasures. For the first time, the metadata is released under the Creative Commons CC0 Public Domain Dedication, meaning that anyone can use the data for any purpose - creative, educational, commercial - with no restrictions. This release, which is by far the largest one-time dedication of cultural data to the public domain using CC0 offers a new boost to the digital economy, providing electronic entr...</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:47:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Evolutionary taxonomy, records management and fish | Future Proof</title>
<link>http://futureproof.records.nsw.gov.au/evolutionary-taxonomy-records-management-and-fish/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+drims+%28Future+Proof%29</link>
<description>Future Proof – Protecting our digital future | A State Records initiative for the NSW Government | Kate Cumming writes &quot;Carol Kaesuk Yoon has written a brilliant book called Naming Nature: The Clash Between Instinct and Science. It’s about scientific taxonomy – the identification and classification of species – but it has so much to say about the theory and process of classification that I think it raises a lot of fascinating issues for our profession as well.&quot;</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 11:03:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Fabasoft &quot;Folio&quot; Records Management is MoReq2 certified</title>
<link>https://www.xing.com/app/forum?op=showarticles;wsa=49517406.39be13;articleid=23497981;id=23497981#23497981</link>
<description>31.07.2009</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:24:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Facebook Graph Search Is Boring: We Need A Unified Search AI | ReadWrite</title>
<link>http://readwrite.com/2013/01/15/facebook-graph-search-is-boring-we-need-a-unified-search-ai</link>
<description>Facebook Graph Search Is Boring: We Need A Unified Search AI | ReadWrite | Jon Mitchell | 15.01.2013 | The big Facebook news tech blogs were all freaking out about turned out to be just another shot in the platform wars. There&#39;s nothing exciting about Facebook&#39;s Graph Search. It&#39;s just another way to lock in free users to a mediocre, incomplete service, just like Google wants to do with Google+. Until there&#39;s a personalized, natural-language search box that can search whatever and wherever we want, I don&#39;t think anything else matters. The way I see it, there are three companies offering rudimentary artificial intelligence to consumers at a grand scale: Google, Apple, and now Facebook. (Sorry, Microsoft, you&#39;re a distant fourth.) All of these companies wa...</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 09:13:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Facebook vs. Google+ | Infographic | Technobombs blog</title>
<link>http://www.technobombs.com/infographic-facebook-vs-google/</link>
<description>Facebook vs. Google+ | Infographic | Technobombs blog | 11.07.2011 || The real problem is - too many social platforms are fighting for your attention: Google+, Linkedin, Twitter, XING, Facebook, Slideshare, Delicious, Scribd, a.s.o. Your time is spoiled and your concentration is devided. You cannot be everywhere and &quot;automation&quot; only creates the &quot;noise of redundancy&quot;. The fight will end soon - there will be a concentration of the majority users to one platform. There as well advertisements, SEO and direct communication will concentrate. And the rest of social platforms will slowly disappear into the shadows of the early history of the electronic information age.</description>
<category domain="http://netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:52:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item></channel></rss>